Networks and inclusive innovation: Experiences from Cambridge and Manchester

The architecture of serendipity

Dr. David Cleevely opened the discussion by reflecting on some of the themes in his recent book, Serendipity: It doesn't happen by accident. Drawing on his own extensive experience in entrepreneurship and innovation, he argued that what often appears as chance is in fact the result of well-structured networks and a culture of curiosity. He highlighted Cambridge’s contribution to UK innovation – which is home to a third of the country’s unicorn companies - and emphasised the need to replicate such success through inclusive, interconnected networks across the UK. His founding of the Centre for Science and Policy (CSaP) was presented as a practical example of how theoretical principles of network-building can be applied.

Regional innovation and social equity

Professor Lou Cordwell, CEO at Unit M, brought a regional and entrepreneurial perspective, discussing her transition from tech entrepreneurship to her current role at the University of Manchester. She emphasised the shared socio-economic challenges faced by both cities, such as disparities in life expectancy and income. The Cambridge-Manchester partnership, she argued, represents a bold attempt to move beyond competition between cities and instead foster collaborative models of growth. With £4.8 million in government funding, the initiative is at a formative stage, offering a rare opportunity to experiment with new approaches to inclusive innovation.

Democratising innovation through partnership

Dr. Kathryn Chapman, reinforced the importance of democratising access to innovation. While serendipity plays an important role, she stressed the need for intentional frameworks that enable broader participation, with people at the heart of economic growth, regardless of academic or professional background. She outlined how the Cambridge-Manchester partnership aims to activate both cities through shared platforms, innovation spaces and “innovation passports” that facilitate mobility and opportunity. By aligning assets and expertise, the partnership seeks to accelerate innovation while ensuring its benefits, such as investment and employment opportunities, are more widely distributed.

Challenges, opportunities and community engagement

The audience discussion delved into the practical challenges and opportunities. When asked about barriers to inclusive innovation, panellists emphasised the importance of physical and social proximity - bringing people together or reaching them where they are. Dr. Chapman highlighted examples such as Cambridge Open Week evolving into outreach at music festivals to engage local communities.

On technology’s role, speakers acknowledged its potential as a leveller but warned of gaps in reskilling and the need for inclusive design. Questions around local pride and participation highlighted the importance of place-based identity and “hyper-local engagement”. The discussion concluded by underscoring the value of diverse perspectives, critical discourse, mutual respect and shared purpose - qualities seen as essential to the success of the Cambridge-Manchester collaboration.